Creation of new neighborhoods elicits mixed reactions

0

[ad_1]

In the exercise of creating new districts, it was proposed to divide Visakhapatnam district into three – Visakhpatnam, Anakapalle and Alluri Sitharamaraju districts.

In the proposed bifurcation, the residual district of Visakhapatnam will mainly consist of the GVMC area and two tax mandals such as Bheemunipatnam and Visakhapatnam.

Under the revenue division of Bheemunipatnam – Anandapuram, Padmanabham, Visakhapatnam (rural) and Maharanipeta, were appointed new mandals. Similarly, in the Visakhapatnam revenue division, the new mandals have been identified as Gajuwaka, Pedagantyada, Gopalapatnam, Mulagada and Seethammadhara. In total, Visakahaptnam district will now have 10 mandals.

In line with the proposed slicing, now the two new wards Anakapalle and Alluri Sitharamaraju, which will be sliced ​​from a larger Visakhapatnam, appear to not only have more mandals, but also appear to be larger in size.

Anakapalle will have two revenue divisions – Anakapalle and Narsipatnam. While the Anakapalle division will have 15 mandals including the existing ones such as Devarapalli, Kasimkota, Yelamanchili and Rambilli. It will also include Parwada, Pendurthi and Sabbavaram, carved out of Visakhapatnam.

Similarly, the Narsipatnam division will have 10 mandals which include mandals such as Payakaraopeta, Golugonda, Makavarapalem, Ravikamatam and Kotauratla. In total, the Anakapalle district will have around 25 mandals.

Alluri Sitharamaraju district is again partly carved out of Visakhapatnam and East Godavari districts and will consist of two revenue divisions – Paderu and Rampachodavaram.

It will retain all 11 Agency mandals which are currently under Visakhapatnam district such as Koyyuru, GK Veedhi, Pedabayalu, Araku, Anantagiri, Paderu, Munchingput and Chintapalli but will also have the addition of seven mandals such as Rampachodavaram, Y. Ramavaram, Addateegala and Maredumilli of Rampachodavaram division of East Godavari district and four mandals such as Yetapaka, Kunavaram and Chintoor of Yetapaka division also of East Godavari. In total, according to the proposal, it will have 22 mandals

Although in all sections of the population the decision to create new neighborhoods has been welcomed, as they believe the idea behind is better administration, a number of social thinkers among them say the proposal lacks research thorough.

The idea of ​​creating smaller districts is good, but doing it on the basis of parliamentary constituencies is a bit unhealthy, said VS Krishna of the Human Rights Forum.

Alluri Sitharamaraju district is proposed from Araku Lok Sabha constituency, but extending it to Ramachodavaram in East Godavari is a bit too much. The distance between Rampachodavaram and Paderu, the seat of the proposed district, is over 280 km, and the distance can be covered in 10 hours. What is the point of dividing up districts, if the logistical problems exist? he asked.

Ajay Kumar of the All India Agricultural and Rural Labor Association (AIARLA) said it would be ideal if the Rampachodavaram and Yetapaka divisions were merged into another district, he said.

There is nothing wrong with having more districts as our neighboring states Odisha and Tamil Nadu have more districts although their geographical area is smaller than Andhra Pradesh, he said. declared.

Welcoming the proposal, former bureaucrat EAS Sarma said the government should have held gram sabhas in the tribal area before proposing the district, especially in the case of Alluri Sitharamaraju district which will be primarily a tribal district.

Tribals should have been part of the decision-making process because that right is enshrined in the Constitution, he said.

Mr. Sarma also suggested that once the districts come into effect and infrastructure construction begins, the state should ensure that the tribal area is not taken over by real estate agents and contractors. “Safeguards must be in effect,” he said.

The former bureaucrat also expressed apprehension over the fate of 533 villages which, although inhabited by tribes, have yet to be included in the fifth schedule of the Constitution. “This is a long-standing request and it is time for these villages, which exist on the outskirts of the Agency’s areas, to be included in the calendar area,” Sarma said.

[ad_2]
Source link

Share.

Comments are closed.